I get tired of seeing more and more horror or suspense films in which nothing happens, nothing interesting, everything is ephemeral and superficial, and this makes the film is poor in content, actions, effects, and mainly in its plot. What better for fans of the genre like me to stick a good jump from the chair to an unexpected scene?. That just seems to be the problem. Ultimately the tapes of "terror" I've seen do not cause even half of that reaction. The horror classics as "Freddy ", "Jason ", "S cream," "The Critters " " The Exorcist" and compared with the productions of today, and has not been long enough to differentiate roughly.
There is also the famous case of remakes of old classics, which are even worse than the new films in recent years. Instead of embellishing the story with technological devices and more content, all you do is sink to the point to cause the rejection of the public for many years loved the original classic. Something similar happened to me " King Kong", which looks like a bad movie but less than great classic. Another typical case is the "Cloverfield " I emphasized that although at the time their strengths and excellent detail, I remain a lifetime with classic. Lack
nothing to do remakes of remakes of remakes of remakes and so the film would be done. It would be the missing element for the total destruction of the genre and turn of creativity. I never found any appeal to do or see remakes.
similar feeling I had while watching "Alien vs. Predator " (like "Freddy vs. Jason ). That film is a masterpiece, but not of terror but the effects and the lack of substance and essence. I have to admit that was interesting to see two murderers by nature and gender concerning struggling with their resources and weapons characteristics. But the real issue is that it is a horror film but of action, and place in this genre is the right thing we can do. Good thing they were seen in separate films, with different patterns as different monsters, each with its style, substance and evil characteristics. But here they are discriminated against are the two masses of flesh and blood (and acid green in the case of Alien) trying to prove who is the best in this. And the truth is that both are the best at what they do, but in isolation.
remember a funny story from which they will understand why I'm so demanding as to be in favor of the good terror. Me very drunk girl movies about hostile aliens coming to Earth to kill us. The attacks were so perfect that even caused admiration, but after that all I managed to do was go round and round in my bed, unable to sleep a wink all night. Result was to spend the bed of my parents and there if unable to sleep, like any infant. Here's an example of what I'm saying.
The gore and zombies
The plot of the dead walking is too trite. Going to the movies claiming to find a good horror flick, we always see the same thing. If we think for a moment all the titles of these films, probably in a minute we can think of forty. And this can not celebrate. It is totally depressing that resemble those forty titles (not to say that they are exactly the same). But unfortunately the genre is affordable and accessible.
With the gore (which is sometimes disappointing terror) the feeling is different. In this genre, usually associated with class B or Z tapes, anything can happen. From seeing blood on exaggerated proportions, even the most excessive violence, twisted creatures walking down the street and everything imaginable, worthy of a director with twisted mind. But this does not bother, as the gore always touches many different subjects. To cite one example, the last gore film that fascinated me is "Planet Terror " or the spectacular " Death Proof," which are present but relatively far from other productions gore. Perhaps the fact that the result of two brilliant minds of women, such as Quentin Tarantino from " Kill Bill" and Robert Rodriguez, Grindhouse both project. It could also appoint as good gore at five "Saw " but it was a big disappointment see the story continued as a mockery of the public, and who wanted to continue with something that would never be equal to the first part.
terror itself short ... there is no longer rare exceptions Europe with much effort. And therefore I spend on going to the cinema to see something like this, not even trust the new directors who give us only remnants of what was the true gender. Masterpieces are those of James Cameron, Alfred Hitchcock, M. Night Shyamalan, and George A. Romero, among others, and sometimes falls into this category, the suspense of Stephen Spielberg with his " Amazing Stories."
tapes as "The Grudge " and " Blairwitch "should never cease to exist as clear examples to follow for a horror movie itself, as a manual of procedure, as the" know how "of the issue. That becomes the real terror! Is not gone, but is hidden who knows where, and there's probably a decent manager who knows what rescue and return.
A Gavin Hood came out all round. The idea of \u200b\u200blooking back to the origins of the world's most famous mutants and make a prequel is a good deal, and more heading to Wolverine, the character emblematic of the history of the X-Men. 
